02 / Code & Security · $5,000 · Two weeks

Shipped fast.
Is it safe to scale?

For products built fast with AI coding tools.

AI coding tools let you ship 10x faster. They don't review their own work, and the things they miss (security boundaries, edge cases, hostile users, scale assumptions) are exactly the things that cause incidents in production. Two senior engineers review your codebase the way an attacker, or your next technical hire, would.

$5,000 · 2 weeks·Senior engineers · Written report · No proposal pushed
Book a 20-minute fit callSee all three audits

What we do

  • Full security review (authentication, authorization, secrets, API exposure) so you find the open door before an attacker or an investor's diligence does
  • Data-handling audit across PII, payment, and regulated flows, so a breach or a compliance gap doesn't surface the hard way
  • Dependency and supply-chain analysis to flag the libraries quietly putting you at risk
  • Reliability review (error handling, fallbacks, monitoring blind spots) so you know how it fails before your users find out
  • Maintainability assessment: can a new engineer actually pick this up, or is it a rewrite waiting to happen?

Best for

  • Founders who shipped on Cursor, Claude Code, Lovable, v0, Bolt, Replit, or Windsurf
  • Products handling user data, payments, or anything regulated
  • Anyone about to scale, raise, or hire on top of an AI-built foundation

What we don't do

  • Judge how you built it. AI coding tools are how modern products get shipped. That's not the problem.
  • Deliver a 200-page generic report. Every finding points at a specific line, file, or flow in your code.
  • Push you toward a long engagement you don't need.

You walk away with

  • A prioritized fix list, ordered by what'll actually hurt you first, that you can work through yourself or hand to a contractor
  • A direct Slack channel with the audit team for the full two weeks, so questions get answered as they come up
  • A 60-minute walkthrough of the findings and the remediation path for each
  • An honest read on what you can safely fix yourself versus what's worth bringing help in for

Proof point to add: one sanitized real finding, e.g. on the last AI-built MVP we reviewed we found admin endpoints with no auth check.

Find out what AI tools missed.

20 minutes to see if your codebase is a fit and what we'd look for.

A short call to confirm scope. No prep, no pitch. If it's not a fit, we'll say so.

Book a 20-minute fit call
Direct intro with the team
Compare the three audits
Find the one that matches your situation

Standard across all three

What every audit includes by default.

Senior engineers only

No juniors, no offshore handoff. The names on the team page are the people doing your audit.

Fixed price, fixed scope

A written agreement before we start. No surprise invoices, no scope creep without your sign-off.

Two-week turnaround

From kickoff to written report. We don't drag audits out. Two weeks, or it doesn't bill.

You own the report

Share it with your team, your board, your investors. The audit is a deliverable, not gated content.

No proposal pushed at the end

You decide what's next. If you want to go further, we'll scope it. If you'd rather act on the report yourself, that's a good outcome too.

Your audit fee credits forward

Engage Centenum after the audit and the full fee credits against the next engagement.